According to the Justice Department, Michel worked with Malaysian financier Low Taek Jho, accepting $120 million as part of a wide-ranging effort to buy political access in the United States. Prosecutors say Michel used some of that money to create a web of roughly 20 straw donors who made illegal contributions to the Obama campaign. The government’s case portrayed Michel as the central architect of an international operation aimed at covertly influencing American politics.

Prosecutors had pushed for a life sentence, citing the scope and severity of the scheme. Michel’s legal team, however, argued that such a punishment would be wildly excessive and recommended three years instead. Defense attorney Peter Zeidenberg called the 14-year sentence “completely disproportionate” and confirmed that Michel will appeal. In court filings, the defense blasted prosecutors’ demands as “absurdly high,” claiming that life sentences are reserved for terrorists and cartel leaders, not for cases like Michel’s.

Adding further drama is the ongoing controversy over Michel’s legal representation. In 2023, he replaced his original lawyer after learning that the attorney had relied on an experimental AI tool to help craft his closing argument. Michel’s new legal team argued that the AI-generated remarks were muddled, ineffective, and fundamentally misunderstood key elements of the case. Their brief claimed the attorney “botched the single most important portion” of the trial and listed numerous additional failings, including allegedly outsourcing trial prep to inexperienced contractors. Despite these concerns—and the unusual AI angle—the request for a new trial was ultimately denied.

Prosecutors, for their part, argued that the defense’s shortcomings were not the issue at all. In their sentencing memo, they emphasized the sheer magnitude of Michel’s conduct, accusing him of betraying the United States by funneling illegal foreign money into a presidential election and attempting to influence top levels of government. They detailed how Michel and his associates tried to interfere with the U.S. investigation into the multibillion-dollar 1MDB scandal and even sought to help return a Chinese national to the PRC without due process. They also cited a pattern of lying, witness tampering, and perjury.

Notably absent from public comment on the case is Barack Obama, who has remained silent despite being mentioned repeatedly in reporting and court filings surrounding the illegal donations. For a former president who rarely shies away from speaking on national issues, his decision to stay quiet on this one has raised eyebrows — though perhaps not entirely unexpectedly.