During a heated exchange, Congressman Adam Schiff demanded serious answers in a congressional setting, emphasizing the importance of accountability and truth in public discourse. “In which members of Congress can get serious answers,” he insisted, pushing for clarity and directness in responses.

Pam Bondi, however, fired back sharply, questioning Schiff’s priorities and past actions. Referencing recent unrest, she asked, “Are the riots in LA serious?” before delivering a personal critique: “I think you owe the president an apology for your entire career, frankly.” Bondi went on to question Schiff’s legal competence, saying, “Clearly you’re a failed lawyer, because you don’t understand when someone can and cannot answer questions.”

The exchange escalated further when Schiff accused Bondi of personal slander, to which she quickly responded, “Personal slander? Will you apologize to Donald Trump for slandering him?” The confrontation highlights the ongoing tension and deep divisions between allies and critics of the former president.

SCHIFF: “In which members of Congress can get SERIOUS answers…”

BONDI: “Are the riots in LA serious? […] I think you owe the president an apology for your entire career, frankly […] Clearly you’re a failed lawyer, because you don’t understand when someone can and cannot answer questions.”

SCHIFF: “I refuse to accept personal SLANDER as an answer!”
BONDI: “Personal slander? Will you apologize to Donald Trump for slandering HIM?”

Pam Bondi just gave the perfect blueprint for dealing with Schiff.