Mel Gibson has been met with backlash from social media users after discussing a conspiracy theory on live TV regarding the Los Angeles wildfires.
Mel Gibson has faced significant backlash on social media after discussing a controversial conspiracy theory related to the Los Angeles wildfires during a live television appearance. The 69-year-old actor opened up about the loss of his Malibu home, which was destroyed in the fires, while speaking on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast over the weekend. Gibson described the experience as deeply personal and emotional, noting how the devastation had impacted him profoundly.
In a separate interview on Elizabeth Vargas Reports on NewsNation, Gibson shared that he was in Austin, Texas, when he learned that his multi-million-dollar mansion had been reduced to ashes. The actor explained that the news was heartbreaking and difficult to process. “I’ve never seen such a complete burn,” Gibson said, recounting the severity of the destruction. “It’s obviously devastating. It’s emotional. You live there for a long time, and it becomes a part of who you are. Losing it like that, it’s just hard to wrap your head around.”
Gibson, however, found himself in hot water following his appearance on the program, where he made remarks that some viewers deemed controversial. During his discussion about the fires, he speculated about their origins and referenced a conspiracy theory that has circulated online. Though he did not provide substantial evidence to support his claims, his comments sparked immediate backlash, with many social media users criticizing him for spreading unverified information.
The conspiracy theory in question has been widely debunked by experts, who attribute the wildfires to natural factors such as extreme heat, drought conditions, and strong winds, compounded by climate change. Despite this, Gibson’s statements fueled debate online, with critics accusing him of using his platform irresponsibly. Others pointed out that the actor’s comments could detract from the real issues surrounding wildfire prevention and response.
The actor’s remarks have reignited conversations about the role of celebrities in disseminating information to the public. Critics argued that public figures have a responsibility to fact-check claims before sharing them, especially on sensitive topics like natural disasters. Some also noted that Gibson’s decision to focus on a fringe theory instead of highlighting the broader impact of the fires or expressing solidarity with other victims was disappointing.
Supporters of Gibson have defended his right to express his opinions, stating that he was simply sharing his personal thoughts during a challenging time. However, the backlash underscores the growing scrutiny of public figures who delve into controversial or polarizing topics without sufficient evidence to support their views.
While Gibson continues to process the loss of his home, his comments have drawn significant attention, further fueling discussions about accountability and the spread of misinformation in the digital age. Whether the actor will address the controversy or clarify his statements remains to be seen.
