🚨Explosive CIA Review Unveils Political Corruption in 2016 Election Assessments

JUST IN!! What is she doing? Kathy Hochul Pathetic New Move Against Trump

This will change how you think about the intelligence community’s role in democracy. A new CIA review reveals that the assessment claiming Russian interference in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump was tainted by a political agenda.

The bombshell report accuses ex-CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper of “excessively” steering the assessment through a chaotic and rushed drafting process. The CIA’s “Tradecraft Review of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment” found the decisions behind the assessment were not just flawed—they may have aimed to undermine Trump’s presidency from the start.

Brennan’s controversial inclusion of the debunked Steele dossier, against the advice of senior CIA Russia experts, “undermined the credibility” of the entire assessment. “This was Obama, Comey, Clapper and Brennan deciding, ‘We’re going to screw Trump,’” said CIA Director John Ratcliffe.

Marco Rubio Issues Massive Statement In Dead of Night This Will Change History

Let that sink in. The review identified “multiple procedural anomalies” and raised suspicions of a “potential political motive.” Key intelligence agencies were sidelined, and the timeline was unnaturally rushed. And get this: the CIA analysts had mere days to prepare a detailed assessment that normally takes months—during a holiday week, no less.

Critics like CNN’s Anderson Cooper have derided such claims, but Ratcliffe emphasizes the severity of the issue. “The decision by agency heads to include the Steele Dossier ran counter to fundamental principles,” he stated.

Once again, let’s reflect on the fallout—this erroneous narrative led directly to Robert Mueller’s two-year-long investigation that ultimately found no collusion. “It ate up the first two years of [Trump’s] presidency,” Ratcliffe lamented.

The review found meticulous leaks and media pressure may have influenced analysts to conform to a biased narrative. “The Putin–Trump nexus struggled to stand on its own,” one CIA analyst remarked. The damage runs deep, risking national security by weaponizing intelligence for political gain.

Ratcliffe’s closing statement is chilling: “They were trying to ruin the presidency after the fact.” As the curtain is lifted on this political theatre, one question remains: Can American democracy endure such corruption from within?