Borge Brende announced Thursday that he is stepping down from his role at the World Economic Forum following an independent review into his past contacts with Jeffrey Epstein. The resignation comes weeks after newly released documents indicated Brende remained in communication with Epstein after Epstein’s prior conviction became public.
The World Economic Forum, widely known for hosting its annual meeting in Davos, said the review did not uncover concerns beyond previously disclosed information. In a statement, the organization said it respected Brende’s decision and thanked him for his leadership during what it described as a significant period of institutional reforms. Brende stated that after careful consideration, he believed stepping aside would allow the forum to move forward without distraction.
The development adds to broader scrutiny surrounding the organization. Earlier this year, the forum’s board initiated a separate review into allegations involving founder Klaus Schwab, who stepped down as chair in April. The overlapping investigations have increased pressure on the high-profile institution, which brings together political, business, and academic leaders from around the world.
Brende, a former foreign minister of Norway, is among several Norwegian public figures referenced in recently released U.S. Justice Department documents related to Epstein’s network. In Norway, former Prime Minister Thorbjorn Jagland has faced legal charges unrelated to Brende’s case, while Crown Princess Mette-Marit publicly expressed regret over past contact with Epstein. Norwegian diplomat Mona Juul also resigned amid separate scrutiny tied to reports about Epstein’s estate.
According to the recently disclosed materials, Brende’s contact with Epstein appeared to continue into 2019. Brende previously said he was unaware of Epstein’s criminal conduct and would not have associated with him had he known. However, reported communications from 2019, including a response to a message referencing Epstein’s legal defense, have drawn renewed attention and criticism, further intensifying debate about accountability among global leaders and institutions.