Benny Johnson: Really quickly here, we have actually that New York Times article that says specifically that Jeff Zients replied all and says, “I approve of the pardons.” Well, that’s not in the Constitution, brother. So does this mean that Dr. Fauci—this is specifically about the Fauci pardon, the ream of pardons that were rolled out—but the Fauci pardon. So you are saying declaratively that it will stand up in court and stand up in any trial before any court in the land, including the Supreme Court, that Dr. Fauci’s pardon is null and void?

House Oversight Chair James Comer: Yes. Yes. I mean, look, at the end of the day, you have to have a formal process for the autopen. And, you know, they’re trying to say, well some of these were approved verbally, some of these we had a memo. There’s emails from the Biden Department of Justice, the Merrick Garland Department of Justice, to the Biden inner circle saying you need to be careful using the autopen so much on legal documents.

And then there are other emails—was the President even aware that this particular person was pardoned? And I mean, so his own Department of Justice is concerned that, number one, there’s excessive unauthorized use of the autopen, and number two, that the President of the United States has no clue who’s being pardoned by his unnamed staffers that are, you know, using the autopen.

And when Donald Trump says it was the autopen presidency, what we saw in the last three months from the time of the debate, the disastrous debate when Joe Biden had to drop out, until the moment of the transfer of power from Biden to Trump, that would be a pretty accurate statement, that it was the autopen presidency.